Page 1 of 1
Deca 250mg vs NPP 100mg?
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 9:29 pm
by MONSTRO
Here alot of athletes claim that NPP is amazing and good choice when you cant tolerate Trenbolone. But deca is 250mg ml , and NPP is 100mg ml.
Is NPP 100mg stronger than Deca 250mg?
Re: Deca 250mg vs NPP 100mg?
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 9:40 pm
by A.font817
MONSTRO wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 9:29 pm
Here alot of athletes claim that NPP is amazing and good choice when you cant tolerate Trenbolone. But deca is 250mg ml , and NPP is 100mg ml.
Is NPP 100mg stronger than Deca 250mg?
To me I wouldn’t say stronger. I would just say the quality of muscle is better maybe? It’s a drier muscle gain and I just look really dense on it. Where deca can make my face bloat alittle and I feel sloppy sometimes, if that makes any sense lol
Re: Deca 250mg vs NPP 100mg?
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:06 pm
by MONSTRO
Of course like test prop vs cyp. but what i ask is worth pay more to receive less? off season we should get some water retention to train heavier and no pain on joints , why use NPP?
Re: Deca 250mg vs NPP 100mg?
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 5:46 pm
by A.font817
MONSTRO wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:06 pm
Of course like test prop vs cyp. but what i ask is worth pay more to receive less? off season we should get some water retention to train heavier and no pain on joints , why use NPP?
Yea deca is amazing off season for the nice heavy sessions with all the water I’ll def agree with that!
Re: Deca 250mg vs NPP 100mg?
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 9:29 pm
by MONSTRO
I never believe in lean bulk . Bulking is like Dorian , Ronnie and Jay do in the past , eat alot and alot of food, train as heavy as possible and rest all the time left .