Is it better to increase testosterone or add another saa?

[Hany-Support]

I get this question often.
increase

Testosterone, do we add a second anabolic?

It will be much better to be on Testosterone, or even reduce it and add a second anabolic.

Fewer side effects caused by constant Testosterone. The higher the dose, the greater the side effects.

We will definitely shock the body more when we throw in something new than we will increase the dose of Testosterone.

In addition, the two agents will work synergistically, giving stronger and better results.

Good Examples of Testosterone + Nandrolone (Deca)

Testosterone+Masterone

Testosterone + Boldenone

And so on.
We have a lot of options, and we choose everything for your goal (mass, reduction, recomposition)

[Vision]

Throwing the addition of Mast is 100% one of the best things to do in these situations due to the fact that it would actually amplify the effects of testosterone, by freeing up more bioavailable test, essentially like hijacking your testosterone by making it more effective, at the same time adding a secondary hormone that is displaying DHT effects that works in tandem with testosterone as both of them being primary both of the main male dominant sex hormones.
Masteron will lower SHBG which in return will have a lower estrogen blood serum level, and a low SHBG will produce a higher free bioavailable testosterone, and that's the testosterone that's actually working for us in lieu of a high amount of balance testosterone that is essentially useless that's floating around their system, with the potential impossibility of converting into estrogen or causing and creating other issues and disturbances by the loitering too long, add mast is a good way to get our testosterone to be more and most effective for us.

[Hany-Support]

Throwing the addition of Mast is 100% one of the best things to do in these situations due to the fact that it would actually amplify the effects of testosterone, by freeing up more bioavailable test, essentially like hijacking your testosterone by making it more effective, at the same time adding a secondary hormone that is displaying DHT effects that works in tandem with testosterone as both of them being primary both of the main male dominant sex hormones.
Masteron will lower SHBG which in return will have a lower estrogen blood serum level, and a low SHBG will produce a higher free bioavailable testosterone, and that's the testosterone that's actually working for us in lieu of a high amount of balance testosterone that is essentially useless that's floating around their system, with the potential impossibility of converting into estrogen or causing and creating other issues and disturbances by the loitering too long, add mast is a good way to get our testosterone to be more and most effective for us.

Exactly as you write. That's why it's worth mixing funds if you know how to do it

[Vision]

Throwing the addition of Mast is 100% one of the best things to do in these situations due to the fact that it would actually amplify the effects of testosterone, by freeing up more bioavailable test, essentially like hijacking your testosterone by making it more effective, at the same time adding a secondary hormone that is displaying DHT effects that works in tandem with testosterone as both of them being primary both of the main male dominant sex hormones.
Masteron will lower SHBG which in return will have a lower estrogen blood serum level, and a low SHBG will produce a higher free bioavailable testosterone, and that's the testosterone that's actually working for us in lieu of a high amount of balance testosterone that is essentially useless that's floating around their system, with the potential impossibility of converting into estrogen or causing and creating other issues and disturbances by the loitering too long, add mast is a good way to get our testosterone to be more and most effective for us.

Exactly as you write. That's why it's worth mixing funds if you know how to do it

Precisely haha.
But you also mentioned Bold "EQ", AND THAT IS ALSO A GREAT ALTERNATIVE.
Not a lot of people realize that bold has some pretty unique properties with also enhancing the effects of testosterone, and other compounds.

Bold, mast and Proviron, these three are great additions, someone can pick one of any three of those when they hit a brick wall with the returns from the testosterone.

When testosterone during the cycle slows down the returns, around week 10-12 ordinarily this is when mylestatin levels are at their highest, and as you and me both know myostatin will blunt the effects of testosterone and the growth at a cellular level in muscle tissue by acting as a regulator with slowing down the recruitment of satellite cells and other cellular initiators and co-transporters.

This you know, but I'm just stating this for the fellow readers.

How do you feel about the incorporation of low dosage of stanazolol during cycles and even some bulk cycles, dosages with orals around 10-20mg an absolutely no higher, simply for the property in which it can demonstrate the ability to lower SHBG, which also would increase free bio testosterone, Plus at low dosages they can act as a mild anti-estrogen and a mild anti-progestin..
When used in such cases to amplify the effects of other hormones, user should not exceed dosages higher than 10-20mg because of its nature with potentially abstracting fluid from the muscle bellies which would dry people out. What is your thoughts on this unorthodox approach?

[Hany-Support]

Throwing the addition of Mast is 100% one of the best things to do in these situations due to the fact that it would actually amplify the effects of testosterone, by freeing up more bioavailable test, essentially like hijacking your testosterone by making it more effective, at the same time adding a secondary hormone that is displaying DHT effects that works in tandem with testosterone as both of them being primary both of the main male dominant sex hormones.
Masteron will lower SHBG which in return will have a lower estrogen blood serum level, and a low SHBG will produce a higher free bioavailable testosterone, and that's the testosterone that's actually working for us in lieu of a high amount of balance testosterone that is essentially useless that's floating around their system, with the potential impossibility of converting into estrogen or causing and creating other issues and disturbances by the loitering too long, add mast is a good way to get our testosterone to be more and most effective for us.

Exactly as you write. That's why it's worth mixing funds if you know how to do it

Precisely haha.
But you also mentioned Bold "EQ", AND THAT IS ALSO A GREAT ALTERNATIVE.
Not a lot of people realize that bold has some pretty unique properties with also enhancing the effects of testosterone, and other compounds.

Bold, mast and Proviron, these three are great additions, someone can pick one of any three of those when they hit a brick wall with the returns from the testosterone.

When testosterone during the cycle slows down the returns, around week 10-12 ordinarily this is when mylestatin levels are at their highest, and as you and me both know myostatin will blunt the effects of testosterone and the growth at a cellular level in muscle tissue by acting as a regulator with slowing down the recruitment of satellite cells and other cellular initiators and co-transporters.

This you know, but I'm just stating this for the fellow readers.

How do you feel about the incorporation of low dosage of stanazolol during cycles and even some bulk cycles, dosages with orals around 10-20mg an absolutely no higher, simply for the property in which it can demonstrate the ability to lower SHBG, which also would increase free bio testosterone, Plus at low dosages they can act as a mild anti-estrogen and a mild anti-progestin..
When used in such cases to amplify the effects of other hormones, user should not exceed dosages higher than 10-20mg because of its nature with potentially abstracting fluid from the muscle bellies which would dry people out. What is your thoughts on this unorthodox approach?

Hi Friend,
So that EQ is on the mass along with Nandrolone the basis for building qualitative mass..
Heavily discussed in these times and "new school". May work for estradiol control. It will support Testosterone, increased strength as it will be next to improved synergy.

Proviron in fixing times for money that the basis. I know a lot of bodybuilders these days who use 50mg for their entire cycles and it's also good that it's an extra addition to the measures, whether you're a bodybuilder or an amateur.
Increasing the possibility of using Testosterone.. Promoting better action to Free Testosterone, and we use it to the full ... Stanazol, can always perfectly check the effective action of Oxandrolone.

Stanazolol worked as well, acting on the skin like paper. while creating protein synthesis = better progress. However, if someone has problems with joints, I advise you to always stop it However, periodically I am for yes.

[Vision]

Exactly as you write. That's why it's worth mixing funds if you know how to do it

Precisely haha.
But you also mentioned Bold "EQ", AND THAT IS ALSO A GREAT ALTERNATIVE.
Not a lot of people realize that bold has some pretty unique properties with also enhancing the effects of testosterone, and other compounds.

Bold, mast and Proviron, these three are great additions, someone can pick one of any three of those when they hit a brick wall with the returns from the testosterone.

When testosterone during the cycle slows down the returns, around week 10-12 ordinarily this is when mylestatin levels are at their highest, and as you and me both know myostatin will blunt the effects of testosterone and the growth at a cellular level in muscle tissue by acting as a regulator with slowing down the recruitment of satellite cells and other cellular initiators and co-transporters.

This you know, but I'm just stating this for the fellow readers.

How do you feel about the incorporation of low dosage of stanazolol during cycles and even some bulk cycles, dosages with orals around 10-20mg an absolutely no higher, simply for the property in which it can demonstrate the ability to lower SHBG, which also would increase free bio testosterone, Plus at low dosages they can act as a mild anti-estrogen and a mild anti-progestin..
When used in such cases to amplify the effects of other hormones, user should not exceed dosages higher than 10-20mg because of its nature with potentially abstracting fluid from the muscle bellies which would dry people out. What is your thoughts on this unorthodox approach?

Hi Friend,
So that EQ is on the mass along with Nandrolone the basis for building qualitative mass..
Heavily discussed in these times and "new school". May work for estradiol control. It will support Testosterone, increased strength as it will be next to improved synergy.

Proviron in fixing times for money that the basis. I know a lot of bodybuilders these days who use 50mg for their entire cycles and it's also good that it's an extra addition to the measures, whether you're a bodybuilder or an amateur.
Increasing the possibility of using Testosterone.. Promoting better action to Free Testosterone, and we use it to the full ... Stanazol, can always perfectly check the effective action of Oxandrolone.

Stanazolol worked as well, acting on the skin like paper. while creating protein synthesis = better progress. However, if someone has problems with joints, I advise you to always stop it However, periodically I am for yes.

Most excellent feedback, This is true and factual that many people whether at bodybuilder level or even amateurs and everyday users have great success with 50mg proviron.
Unfortunately people believe that more is better, when in fact less can be more.

And the topic and discussion is very interesting regarding EQ, and it's potential properties with balancing out estrogen, with the new school way of thinking and more data that becomes available, It is starting to prove itself as a possible contender with the fight against estrogen. People should not mistaken, that it is not an estrogen inhibitor, people should use the proper ancillaries, however knowing that this agent EQ would also act as a beneficiary can be a breath of fresh air.